The release of the five most dangerous terrorists from Guantanamo in exchange for Bowe
Bergdahl has sparked quite a bit of controversy.
This is a summary, at this time,
as more "revelations" are published every day.
It was a decision against the
will of Congress (us, the people), the advice of the military and without
consultation:
▬
The White House administration failed to observe
the law, passed by Congress and signed by Obama, to give 30 day notice to
Congress before releasing any prisoners from Guantanamo Bay.
▬
White House press secretary Jay Carney, on June 21st 2013, asked about a
possible release of terrorists from Guantanamo in exchange for Bowe Bergdahl said
"we
would not make any decisions about transfer of any detainees without consulting
with Congress and without doing so in accordance with U.S. law".
But they went ahead without approval. Jay Carney resigned on May 30th,
2014. Bergdahl
was released May 31st,2014.
▬
Congress had twice denied the release of
prisoners in exchange for Bergdahl.
▬
The administration was warned by the Military
NOT to do the exchange, but they went ahead against their advice.
▬
The Administration did not consult Secret
Services.
▬
The Administration did not consult with its
Allies, who fought alongside the US to defeat the Taliban and capture their
leaders.
▬
The deal legitimizes the Taliban, as a power to
deal with.
▬
The deal endangers the future of Americans, as
terrorists worldwide may attempt to kidnap Americans, for money or exchange of
"prisoners".
▬
The deal is an immediate treat, as the five
Taliban leaders will start directing their forces against America and Western
nations.
▬
The deal strengthens the enemy (a definition of
treason), by returning prisoners before the war against the Taliban is over.
In addition, it was a political
decision, not in the interest of America, but in the interest of Obama:
▬
So that after releasing the worst terrorists he
can justify closing Guantanamo, a forever due political IOU.
▬
So that Obama, Hillary and Rice can pronounce
the prepared talking point: "America does not leave their men
behind", as a counter measure to the Benghazi scandal.
▬
So that he can be seen by Muslim leaders as
helping Muslims (The father and Bergdhal himself are Muslim).
It is also a question of poor
judgment:
▬
Releasing the top five most dangerous terrorists
for one man who has no apparent confidential knowledge or strategic military
value?
▬
Releasing five terrorists for a defector?
▬ The president feels that he can honestly deal with terrorists and Muslim extremists, for example mandating "limitations" after their release.
▬
Allowing the father to praise Allah in Arabic in
the Rose Garden?
▬
What are American Allies going to think?
Releasing the top fighters against the Allied forces that fought with their
blood for ten years to capture them?
▬
What are the Afghani people going to think,
after allied forces occupied their country to get rid of the Taliban, and now
the Americans release their leaders?
Finally it is more lies, as
usual:
▬
Susan Rice again she pronounced a lie on media
interviews, that Bergdhal was captured in the battlefield and that he
"served with honor and distinction".
▬
President Obama said that they had to intervene
because "his health was rapidly deteriorating". When it became
apparent that this was not the case, he changed his story and said that the
Taliban was about to kill him.
▬
President Obama stated that no men had lost
their life while seeking for Bergdahl, although this fact is confirmed by many
people in the unit.
▬
The men in his military unit were made to sign a
gag agreement "not to say" what really happened, so that the
Administration could spin the event as they pleased. Fortunately these men are
men of honor and spoke the truth when it was evident
that they were used to perpetrate a felony.
▬
The father spoke in Arabic claiming that the son
would have "trouble with English" and then he does not speak to the
son in Pashto, but praises Allah in Arabic?
▬
Secretary of defense Chuck Hagel said that the
final decision was taken by President Obama. However, Obama on June 10th
said that Hagel took the final decision!
No comments:
Post a Comment